Loading...

Admissionsinfrastructurefor universities.

Software that helps admissions teams organize applicant documents and apply their institution's own criteria consistently. People make every admissions decision.

Application · A-2041With staff
01 · Sources
transcript.pdfielts_trf.pdfdegree.jpg
02 · Structured record
Qualification
BSc (Hons)
p.1
GPA
3.42 / 4.0
p.2
IELTS overall
7.0
trf
03 · Criteria v12
  • ✓English ≥ 6.5
  • ✓GPA ≥ 3.0
  • !Prerequisites 2 of 3For staff
04 · Staff review
Admissions officerReviews the recommendation and decides
Built for Australian requirementsAustralian Privacy PrinciplesISO 27001 certifiedWorks with your existing SIS & CRM

Your handbook, as infrastructure.

AutoEnrol keeps your admissions criteria in one versioned, reviewable place and applies them consistently to every application. Your staff review every recommendation and decide every outcome.

Step 01

Your criteria, in one place.

We work with your staff to document the criteria you already apply, including thresholds, prerequisites, country equivalencies, and exceptions, in one place the whole institution can review. Your staff maintain it.

Admissions criteriav10v11v12
English
IELTS 6.5, no band below 6.0
Prerequisites
Set per course
Equivalencies
112 countries
Maintained by your staff
Step 02

Documents organized. Criteria applied consistently.

Transcripts, certificates, and test scores are organized into a structured record, with every value linked back to its source page. Your criteria are applied the same way every time, and uncertain cases are flagged for your staff.

Step 03

Your staff review. Your staff decide.

Every recommendation comes with a plain-language rationale and a trail back to the criteria and source documents. Staff check it, change it, or set it aside. The decision is theirs.

RecommendationSuggested · Conditional
  • ✓English 7.0 meets 6.5
  • !Prerequisite 3 unclearFor staff
ApproveChangeSet aside
Decision recorded by staff

Messy documents in. Clean data out.

Transcripts, certificates, test reports, and passports. Scanned, photographed, low-resolution, or multi-page. Native coverage of 100+ countries and credential systems, with bounding-box traceability back to the source page. This is where AI is used. Your staff still decide.

99.7%
extraction accuracy

Measured across transcripts, degree certificates, English test reports, and government-issued IDs, including photographed pages, skewed scans, and non-Latin scripts.

  • Transcripts & academic records
  • Degree & completion certificates
  • IELTS · TOEFL · PTE · Duolingo
  • Passports & national IDs
  • Statements of purpose & references
  • 100+ countries and credential systems
Reading · transcript.pdf · page 1 of 2Live
Structured record
InstitutionUniversity of MelbourneA
CredentialBSc (Hons)B
GPA3.42 / 4.0C
ConferredPartly obscuredD
1 field sent to staff to confirm

Responsible by design.

Our approach follows the six essential practices of the National AI Centre's Guidance for AI Adoption: accountability, impact, risk, transparency, testing, and human control.

01

Accountability

Each institution owns its criteria, its processes, and its decisions. We are accountable for the software we supply and how it behaves.

02

Impact and consultation

Before the software is introduced, we work with institutions to understand its effect on applicants and staff, including consultation with the people whose work it touches.

03

Transparency

Every recommendation is traceable to a specific criterion and a specific document, and we give institutions what they need to explain our software to applicants, staff, and regulators.

04

Human control

Admissions staff review and decide outcomes. They can see the reasoning behind every recommendation and set any of it aside. Uncertain or unusual cases are flagged for closer human attention, never resolved quietly by the software.

The criteria iceberg.

Admissions criteria run deeper than any published handbook. AutoEnrol handles the documented layers consistently, so the cases that need experience and context reach your staff with everything they need.

Above the waterlineStandard checks

Published entry criteria

GPA thresholds, English requirements, subject prerequisites. Documented and applied consistently.

Waterline
Mid-depthEquivalencies

Country equivalencies and overrides

Qualification mappings and program-by-program overrides, documented with your staff and kept in one reviewable place.

Below the waterlineAdmissions discretion

Edge cases and context

Unusual credentials, exceptions, and circumstances that call for experience. These are flagged for your staff, not resolved by the software.

Organized and checked against your criteria
Decided by admissions staff

The deeper the case, the more it belongs with your people.

One platform, four perspectives.

AutoEnrol is designed so no group has to compromise its core responsibility.

Admissions leadership

Timely, consistent outcomes.

Applicants hear back sooner, and every application is assessed against the same published criteria, with decisions made by your staff.

Privacy & governance

Transparent by default.

Every recommendation carries an audit trail, and we provide what you need for the privacy policy disclosures APP 1.7 to 1.9 require from 10 December 2026.

Admissions staff

The system proposes. You decide.

Document checks arrive organized, and unusual cases are flagged for your expertise. You can see the reasoning behind every recommendation and set any of it aside.

CIO / IT

Fits your stack.

ISO 27001. Regional data storage. API-ready for SIS and CRM integration. Pilots run with zero production touch.

The 150-application pilot.

See AutoEnrol's recommendations next to your staff's own outcomes, rule by rule, with zero integration and zero policy compromise. Your staff lead the evaluation and decide whether, and how, to go further.

Talk to us about a pilot →2-4 weeks · kickoff to results
  1. Up to 150 anonymised applications

    Across three courses you choose. Real historical applications, fully de-identified.

  2. No technical integration required

    No API hookups, no SIS changes. Data flows via a secure transfer, and nothing touches production.

  3. Side-by-side comparison with your staff

    Every AutoEnrol recommendation compared with your staff's outcome, rule by rule.

Built for Australian requirements.

Designed around the Australian Privacy Principles, from the first pilot through to production.

ISO 27001

Certified information security management. Independently audited controls over data handling and confidentiality.

Regional data storage

Records are stored in the institution's region, with Australian, EU, UK, and US options.

Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Personal information is handled only to provide the service an institution has engaged us for. Pilots run on de-identified data.

Decision-making transparency

From 10 December 2026, APP 1.7 to 1.9 require privacy policies to describe software that contributes to significant decisions. We document how ours is used, with a full audit trail behind every recommendation.

The questions we're asked first.

For admissions teams, staff, IT, privacy officers, and anyone who wants to understand how AutoEnrol is used.

What is AutoEnrol?
Admissions infrastructure for universities. AutoEnrol helps admissions teams organize applicant documents and apply their institution's own criteria consistently. Staff review the results and make every admissions decision.
Does AutoEnrol make admissions decisions?
No. Admissions staff make decisions. AutoEnrol prepares information and a recommendation that staff can check, change, or set aside. Because the software contributes to decisions that matter to applicants, institutions using it should describe it in their privacy policy, and we help them do so.
Is AutoEnrol designed to replace admissions staff?
No. It is designed to support the people who do this work, by reducing repetitive document handling and giving them clearer information. We encourage institutions to consult their staff and staff representatives before introducing it, and we are glad to take part in that process.
How is AutoEnrol different from a CRM, an SIS, or generic "AI admissions" tools?
CRMs and SIS platforms manage the application workflow; generic AI admissions tools typically score applicants with an opaque model. AutoEnrol is neither. It organizes the documents, applies the institution's own criteria consistently, and gives staff a recommendation with a rule-by-rule audit trail. It complements your CRM and SIS rather than replacing them.
What kinds of applications and documents does AutoEnrol handle?
International undergraduate and postgraduate applications, with native coverage of 100+ countries and credential systems. Supported documents include academic transcripts, degree certificates, English-test reports (IELTS, TOEFL, PTE), GMAT/GRE scores, passports, and statements of purpose, across native scripts, scans, and photographed pages.
Will we have to change our admissions policy to use AutoEnrol?
No. Your handbook is the source of truth. We document your thresholds, your prerequisites, your country equivalencies, and your exceptions, not a vendor scorecard. Your standards stay yours.
What happens if a regulator asks us to justify a specific recommendation?
Every recommendation carries a full rule-by-rule audit trail, an easy to understand rationale, and traceability back to the source documents. The explanation is generated alongside the recommendation, not reconstructed afterwards.
How do you handle credentials from countries we rarely see?
Native coverage of 100+ countries and credential systems. Anything uncertain is flagged for your staff. The system is designed to admit what it does not know.
How is personal information protected?
We handle personal information under the Australian Privacy Principles, store records in the institution's region, and operate ISO 27001-certified security controls. Pilots run on de-identified data. Our Trust Center holds further documentation.
Which AI guidance does AutoEnrol follow?
Our approach follows the National AI Centre's Guidance for AI Adoption and the Australian Privacy Principles, including the automated decision-making transparency requirements that commence on 10 December 2026.
What if a recommendation disagrees with our staff?
Your staff decide. Every divergence is surfaced, and your team chooses whether to adjust the criteria or decide the case differently. The pilot is designed to show exactly where and why recommendations differ.

Admissions infrastructure. Decided by people.

For institutions, their staff and staff representatives, and anyone with questions about how our software is used.

Contact us →